DSpace Repository

Comparison of Economic Benefits of Organic and Conventional Modes of Paddy Cultivation A Study in the Kalutara District

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dayarathne, H.K.S.P.
dc.contributor.author Gunawardena, U.A.D.P.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-12-01T04:24:44Z
dc.date.available 2015-12-01T04:24:44Z
dc.date.issued 2015-12-01T04:24:44Z
dc.identifier.citation Dayarathne, H.K.S.P., & Gunawardena, U.A.D.P (2015). Comparison of Economic Benefits of Organic and Conventional Modes of Paddy Cultivation A Study in the Kalutara District. Proceedings of the 71st Annual Sessions of Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science (Part I), 83.
dc.identifier.issn 13910248
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1965
dc.description.abstract There is a recent trend among farmers in Sri Lanka to practice organic paddy cultivation. This is due to higher market prices and demand for traditional rice varieties. However, studies to compare economic benefits of two systems are lacking. Therefore, the objectives of this study were a) to understand social and economic aspects which are pertinent for the adoption of organic rice production, and b) to compare economic profits between two paddy cultivation systems. Kalutara District was selected as the study area as farmers in the District practice both systems successfully. The survey was conducted in three divisional secretariat areas, Horana, Ingiriya and Madurawala that were randomly selected. One hundred and ten (110) and forty six (46) farmers practicing conventional and organic methods respectively were selected for the study. Data on quantities and prices of inputs and outputs during Yala season 2014, other farming practices, and socioeconomic information of farmers were collected using a structured survey schedule. Data were analyzed descriptively, all economic benefits and costs were valued and farm budgets were computed. The results indicate that paddy cultivation in the area is mainly practiced as a secondary income generation activity. Contribution by female labour is 20% higher in organic cultivation. Farm size of conventional farmers is 0.4 ha while that of organic farmers is 0.2 ha. Costs for labor and organic fertilizer are higher in organic mode, whereas costs of machinery and agro-chemicals are higher in conventional mode. Total revenues are high for conventional farmers. However, the ratio of total returns to costs is higher in organic mode than in conventional mode with 2.15 and 2.06 as values for organic paddy and conventional paddy respectively. Higher environment benefits occur in organic cultivation. Based on the findings it can be concluded that the organic system of cultivation is economically and environmentally more profitable than the conventional system of cultivation. Implications for policy include the need to provide adequate incentives for practicing organic farming. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science, Colombo 07
dc.subject Economic analysis en_US
dc.subject environmental benefits en_US
dc.subject cultivation practices en_US
dc.subject input use en_US
dc.subject traditional rice varieties en_US
dc.title Comparison of Economic Benefits of Organic and Conventional Modes of Paddy Cultivation A Study in the Kalutara District en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.date.published 2015


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account